5G on your house in exchange for free Wifi Not Good!

Please Make This a Priority —
No Matter How Busy You Are

Dr. Kent Chamberlin, Professor Emeritus and former Chair, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Hampshire, will take us through the rigorous legislative investigation NH into 5G and wireless technology.

Like most, when he was assigned to the Commission, he though this would a “slam dunk” — there couldn’t possibly be anything wrong with wireless.

Their investigation of the science and risks documents otherwise.

The Urgency

The Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense are suing the FCC for ignoring the science, and the federal courts may finally force the FCC to bring their radiation exposure limits in line with the science. This does not bode well for the wireless industry.

So the industry is installing toxic 5G infrastructure as fast as they can in our communities, at close range to our bedrooms, classrooms and offices, before the judges rule.

We just measured the radiation levels in Boston’s historic North End yesterday and they are already in the Extreme Concern category of the Building Biology Precautionary Guidelines for Sleeping Areas. Those guidelines are established based on the peer-reviewed science.

We took power density peak measurement readings using the calibrated Safe & Sound Pro II Radiofrequency Meter, which measures in microWatts per square meter:

  • The No Concern level is less than 0.1
  • The Slight Concern level is 0.1 – 10
  • The Severe Concern level is 10 – 1,000
  • The Extreme Concern level is over 1,000

We were astounded to see peak readings in Boston of 33,000 to 613,000. The science shows it is these peak spikes of radiation at millions/billions of cycles per second that damage our biological cells.

It Gets Worse, Unfortunately

Not only is the wireless industry putting hazardous 4G/5G small cell antennas on poles in the public access way on neighborhood streets — they are already all over Boston and other cities — the FCC just changed the rules and now industry can incentivize residents to put a toxic cell antenna on their rooftops with no warning of the biological harm to people, pets, pollinators or the planet.

If you allow an antenna on your property, you will pulse radiation at yourself, your loved ones and your neighbors 24×7. Many begin to suffer insomnia, headaches, dizziness, anxiety, nausea, depression, anger, cognitive impairment, behavior issues and more when cell antennas go up. Most doctors haven’t been trained yet to treat electromagnetic illnesses so most patients are misdiagnosed.

As the NH report further reveals, wireless radiation is a neurotoxin and an immune suppressant, and long-term exposure can cause DNA damage, cancer, infertility and more. Children are especially vulnerable as their systems are still under development.

Please, Do Your Civic Duty

Mainstream media has conflicts of interest with industry, so you won’t hear the facts through popular channels. That is why it is critical that we listen to the non-industry experts including those who Dr. Chamberlin and the other NH Commissioners interviewed.

This is the first time in the U.S. a true, transparent investigation has been conducted by a legislative body and they debunk the industry’s disinformation campaigns.

Regardless of what you may currently think of the risks, please schedule an hour into your weekend to watch this upcoming discussion with Dr. Chamberlin.

Maybe start thinking about — if you are motivated by what you will hear — who else should also know: loved ones, neighbors, colleagues, your state and federal legislators, your local municipal boards, medical team and emergency responders.

Perhaps start researching emails and phone numbers of those you don’t already have…

There is Good News

We can learn to reduce the radiation exposures coming from our own devices. Our cell phones, DECT cordless phones, routers, baby monitors, gaming devices, wireless security systems, wearables, smart appliances, etc., all pulse this radiation 24×7.

With just a little education many decide to turn off all the antennas and hard-wire technology through cables and adapters, and/or keep devices in airplane mode and only take them out of airplane mode just long enough to send/receive new data.

So many adults and children see remarkable improvements in sleep, energy level, anxiety, depression, anger, headaches, behavior issues, communication disorders and more simply by choosing safe technology and minimizing the wireless radiation.

And, once you hard-wire with cables/adapters, you’ll notice you get a much better, faster, more reliable and secure connection.

For the areas we cannot directly control — cell towers, 4G/5G small cell antennas, utility “smart” meters — there are many efforts underway we can join or initiate to transition our communities to safe technology: legislation, lawsuits and local ordinance updates.

Stay tuned, we’ll be sending the video with Dr. Chamberlin this week. In the interim, feel free to explore the links in my signature. You’ll find the NH report, EMF Medical Conference, and Wireless Education quick training courses for schools, families and companies.

 

Thanks, as ever, for your time and consideration.

Cece & the MA for Safe Technology Team

Cecelia (Cece) Doucette, MTPW, BA
Technology Safety Educator
Director, Massachusetts for Safe Technology
Founder, Understanding EMFs
Education Services Director, Wireless Education
EMF Medical Conference 2021
TechSafe Schools
NH Legislative Commission Report
City of Boston Legal Comment to FCC
HiBR Conference @ NIH
Expert Forum on Wi-fi in Schools
Municipal Presentation on 5G & EMFs
Additional YouTube EMF Talks
Generation Zapped Award-Winning Film

 

 

 

5G hurts

Scientists have proven that radio frequency (RF)
radiation can be absorbed by insects, raising
internal temperatures, interfering with
reproduction or triggering other responses. This
has dramatic implications for our natural world
as purveyors of 5G technology push ahead with
their plans to blanket the country with powerful
4G/5G antennas.

References:

Radio-Frequency Electromagne5c Field Exposure of Western Honey Bees. Theilens, A., et al.
Scien5fic Reports 10, 461 (2020).
Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagne5c Fields from 2 to 120 GHz. Theilens, X.,
et al. Scien5fic Reports 8, 3924 (2018).
Effect of high-frequency radia5ons on survival of the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Darney, K.
et al. Apidologie 47:703-710 (2016).
Mobile phone-induced honeybee worker piping. Theilens, O., et al. Apidologie (2011).
Exposure to cell phone radia5ons produces biochemical changes in worker honey bees.
Kumar, N.R., et al. Toxicology Interna5onal 18(1):70-72 (2011).
Changes in honeybee behavior and biology under the influence of cellphone radia5ons.
Sharma, V.P. & Kumar, N.R. Current Science 98(10):1376-1378 (2010).
Can Electromagne5c Exposure Cause a Change in Behavior? Studying Possible Non-Thermal
Influences on Honey Bees – An Approach within the Framework of Educa5onal Informa5cs.
Theilens, A., et al. (2006).
Effect of GSM 900-MHz Mobile Phone Radia5on on the Reproduc5ve Capacity of Drosophila
melanogaster, Panagopoulos, D.J., Karabarbounis, A., & Margari5s, L.H. Electromagne5c
Biology and Medicine 23(1):29-43 (2004).
Effects of Mobile Phone Radia5on on Reproduc5on and Development in Drosophila
Melanogaster. Weisbrot, D. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 89(1):48-55 (2003)
Evidence For Nonthermal Effects of Microwave Radia5on: Abnormal Development of
Irradiated Insect Pupae. Carpenter, R.L. & Livestone, E.M. IEEE Transac5ons on Microwave
Theory and Techniques 19(2) (1971).

source: Americans for Responsible Technology http://www.americansforresponsibletech.org

If you love bees and trees – hate 5G!

This is important for you to be aware of. Utilities are putting up 5G radiofrequency units on poles throughout the world and even President Trump wants to see it rolled out all over the USA. While you may think this will help your connectivity, it has been shown not to be that beneficial over 4G and there are numerous safer alternatives to supply service in remote areas. We don’t need an ugly group of hundred-pound units on the top of every so many poles on our street. Plus the radio-frequencies have proven to have a negative effect on not only our health but the health of nearby trees, birds and bees.

Currently, 5G technology is effective only over short distances and doesn’t penetrate through solids—requiring numerous antennae with unobstructed paths between transmitters and receivers. Wireless antennas emit microwaves – non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation – and essentially function as cell towers. Each installation can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously. They increase electromagnetic radiation near homes. Property values drop after a cell tower is built near homes and this ugly units will do nothing for curb appeal. Health effects to people and animals include:

  • Increased Wireless Exposure– Since this new standard will require extensive towers, Users will be subjected to more cell tower radiation as it will be nearly impossible to escape wireless radiation as more wireless-enabled devices will appear on the market.
  • Increased Number of Electromagnetic-Sensitivity (ES) Cases – ES is the condition in which people develop intolerances to radiation from wireless technology devices such as cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, smart meters and antennas. Symptoms range from tingling and headaches to sleep disturbances, nausea and memory problems. With the increased radiation associated with 5G, we can expect to see a drastic uptick in the number ES cases. For more information on EHS go to www.safehelpsyou.org
  • Negative Environmental Impacts– Wildlife is expected to be affected by the introduction of widespread 5G. It is theorized that the navigation of birds and insects (especially bees) will be disrupted and more research is required to explore the exact repercussions of Wi-Fi radiation on our environmental surrounding. According to a study by Wageningen University in the Netherlands, radio frequency signals could very well be responsible for the diseased trees, which exhibited bark tears, bleeding and leaves prematurely dying. Trees with closest proximity to Wi-Fi networks suffered from telltale indicators of radiation sickness, including a “lead-like shine” on their leaves, which is caused by the deterioration of outer-cell layers — leading to premature death of the foliage.
  • *bulleted text and photo taken from the Canadian website http://c4st.org

We believe the responsible course of action is to defer 5G deployment until the full biological and environmental effects are understood. To protect our health, more research must be undertaken. Additionally, there should always be an option to opt-out from 5G technology from devices like appliances and cars—ensuring the safety of those with electromagnetic-sensitivities, the elderly and the young. – the AntiAgingLady

.During the recent years over 240 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” , via EMF Scientists Appeal, regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices – already before the additional 5G roll-out. The over 240 scientists refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.As of March 31 2019, 229 scientists and medical doctors have signed the appeal. The 5G Appeal is still open for endorsement for scientists (PhD, professor) or medical doctors (MD. Please contact professor em. Rainer Nyberg or ass. professor Lennart Hardell.  (Contact.)